The rise of artificial art is clear and will continue in the future. But when will it stop? Are there any limits, or are the boundaries few? The questions may seem broad, but what truly complicates things is my own thoughts. An artist’s hard work and material choices can easily be overlooked in this algorithm-driven world.
Experiencing the creativity of others and the amazing variety of artworks is one of life’s greatest joys. Standing in front of a piece makes you curious, leading you to ask the artist questions like: how did you create this? How long did it take? Or how did you make it so perfect?
As an art historian and analyst, I seek deeper questions, but if algorithms create the art, do these questions become insignificant? What does it mean for creativity and authenticity when brush strokes come from code?
Nowadays, artificial art is everywhere, leading to increased skepticism. I often find myself spending more time checking if an artwork is AI-generated instead of focusing on its content, themes, and story.
Such a situation is challenging for me as an observer and disheartening for real artists. Their work often goes unrecognized or unappreciated, leading to skepticism among viewers. This overshadowing by AI artists like Salvador AI or Vincent van AI can be frustrating for those who care deeply about human creativity.
As long as art galleries display talent, human-made can stand out. With the growth of digital media, more people are curious about art, which may encourage them to visit exhibitions and appreciate art in its true form.
My goal is to attend many exhibitions each year and often visit museums and historical sites. I document each visit with reports on this blog. The images, locations, and historical contexts are real. Castles aren’t created by algorithms, and brushstrokes don’t come from keyboards or screens.
Note: The image for the post is, of course, AI-generated – if you were wondering?
© Björn Blomqvist 2026-02-16
Blomman’s Art and Poetry 
Comment